Theorem 1, the growth of the minimax regret, and the frontier #
This file proves Theorem 1 of the paper (Composite alternative), following its proof in
Section S1.7, the claims of Section 4.3 on the growth of the minimax regret in the worst case over
μ, the frontier of Section 1, and the claim of Section S2.5 on when Γ_T tends to infinity. The
lower bound (S9) is Lemma S6 (lem_fixedk_proof).
isEProcess_ite_zero_one: replacingE_0by1preserves the e-process property, since every stopping timeτof(ℱ_t)satisfiesτ = 0everywhere orτ ≥ 1everywhere;kappa_add_regret_le_iSup_regret_altDist: fort ≥ 1andE ∈ ℰ_t,sup_μ R^μ_t(E) ≥ ∫ R^μ_t(E) N(0, ρ²)(dμ) = tκ − E_Q(log E) = κ + R_t(E), the averaging step of the proof of Theorem 1(i), done separately for the positive and negative parts oflog E;kappa_add_minimaxRegret_le_worstCaseandworstCase_le_kappa_add_log_eta: the two inequalities of Theorem 1(i);thm_composite_proof: Theorem 1;sec4_growth_proof,intro_frontier_proof,sec_frontier_proof: the claims of Sections 4.3, 1, and S2.5.
In the averaging step, the paper computes the average of R^μ_t(E) over μ; we show instead
that R^μ_t(E) ≤ r for every μ implies κ + R_t(E) ≤ r, by averaging the e-powers
E_{Q_μ}(log E) ≥ tκ − r, which is the same computation with a bound in place of the average.
Replacing E_0 by one #
Replacing E_0 by 1 preserves the e-process property (proof of Theorem 1): since ℱ₀ is
trivial, every stopping time τ satisfies τ = 0 everywhere, so that E_τ = 1, or τ ≥ 1
everywhere, so that E_τ is unchanged.
The averaging step of the proof of Theorem 1(i) #
The averaging step of the proof of Theorem 1(i): for s ≤ 1, t ≥ 1, and E ∈ ℰ_t,
κ + R_t(E) ≤ sup_μ R^μ_t(E). If R^μ_t(E) = tκ − E_{Q_μ}(log E) ≤ r for every μ, then
E_{Q_μ}(log E) ≥ tκ − r, the average over μ ∼ N(0, ρ²) gives E_Q(log E) ≥ tκ − r, and
R_t(E) = (t − 1)κ − E_Q(log E) ≤ r − κ.
Theorem 1(i) #
Theorem 1(i), lower bound: κ + Γ_T ≤ inf_{(E_t)} max_{0≤t≤T} sup_μ R^μ_t(E_t) for
T ≥ 1.
Theorem 1(i), upper bound: inf_{(E_t)} max_{0≤t≤T} sup_μ R^μ_t(E_t) ≤ κ + log η_T, with
the e-process (E*_{t∧T}/η_T)_{t≥0} of Proposition 1(iii), whose terms are functions of the
Y_i.
Theorem 1 #
Theorem 1.
The growth of the minimax regret and the frontier #
The growth of the minimax regret (Section 4.3): Theorem 1 with ρ = 1 shows that the
minimax regret in the worst case over μ tends to infinity, and its upper bound κ + log η_T
grows like log log T, more slowly than any power of log T.
For the alternatives Q_μ, with any numéraires, the minimax regret is bounded: it is zero for
s ≤ 1 and at most log s for s > 1 (Proposition S4).
The frontier of the Gaussian location problem (Section 1), from the statement of
Lemma S6: the minimax regret in the worst case over μ is bounded if and only if s ≥ 1.
When the minimax regret tends to infinity (Section S2.5): for the alternatives Q_μ,
Γ_T is bounded (Proposition S4); for the mixtures, Γ_T → ∞ exactly when s < 1 and ρ > 0,
by Proposition S5, by Proposition 4 for s ≥ 1, and by Proposition S4 for ρ = 0.