Proposition 3 and the limit of Γ_T in Proposition S5 #
This file assembles Proposition 3 of the paper and the limit of Γ_T/log log T of Proposition S5
of the supplementary material from the bounds of RateUpper.lean, RateLower.lean, and
RateMixture.lean, and from the lower bound (S9) of Lemma S6 (lem_fixedk_proof). The limit of
log η_T/log log T of Proposition S5 is in RateEveryRho.lean.
fixedKBound_le_of_lem_fixedk: the conclusion of Lemma S6 in the formfixedKBound ≤ Γ_T;prop_mixture_of_fixedK: Proposition 3, following its proof in Section S1.6: the lower bound of (i) from (S9), the upper bound fromΓ_T ≤ log η_T(Proposition 1(iii)) and Lemma S3, and (ii) fromRateMixture.lean;isNumeraire_gaussNumeraire_mixAlt_of_div_le: fort ≥ 1with(1 − s²)/t ≤ ρ², the proof of Proposition 2 applies at the horizont, and∏_{i=2}^t ℓ(Y_i)is the numéraire ofQatt;regret_gaussNumeraire_div: for any numérairesEsofQandb ∈ [1, ∞), the regret ofΠ_t/b, withΠ_t = ∏_{i=2}^t ℓ(Y_i), islog b + d_t, whered_t = E_Q(log Es_t) − (t − 1)κis the differenceν_t − E_Q(log Π_t)of the proof of Proposition S5 (Lemma S1);exists_minimaxRegret_le_log_eta_add:Γ_T ≤ C + log η'_TforT ≥ 1, whereη'_Tis the value of Lemma 2(ii) andC = max_{t < t_ρ} d_t;tendsto_minimaxRegret_of_fixedK:Γ_T/log log T → 1 − s²for any numéraires ofQand everyρ > 0, the first limit of Proposition S5;prop_mixture_proof: Proposition 3.
In the proof of Proposition S5, the paper bounds d_t by C = max_{t < t_ρ} d_t; we take the sum
of the |d_t| over t < t_ρ, which is also a bound. The integer t_ρ is here
⌈(1 − s²)/ρ²⌉ + 1, at least the paper's ⌈(1 − s²)/ρ²⌉, so that t_ρ ≥ 1.
Lemma S6 in the form of RateLower.lean #
The conclusion of Lemma S6, with its let bindings, in the form fixedKBound ≤ Γ_T.
Proposition 3 #
Proposition 3, given the lower bound (S9) of Lemma S6 for the numéraires of Proposition 2.
The numéraire at the horizons t ≥ t_ρ #
For t ≥ 1 with (1 − s²)/t ≤ ρ², the mixing variance ρ² − (1 − s²)/t is nonnegative, and
the proof of Proposition 2 shows that E*_t = ∏_{i=2}^t ℓ(Y_i) is the numéraire of Q at the
horizon t, with P*_t = ∫ P_{θ,t} N{0, ρ² − (1 − s²)/t}(dθ).
The upper bound of Proposition S5 #
The regret of Π_t/b (proof of Proposition S5): for any numéraires Es of Q, every
t, and b ∈ [1, ∞), the regret of Π_t/b with Π_t = ∏_{i=2}^t ℓ(Y_i) is log b + d_t, where
d_t = E_Q(log Es_t) − (t − 1)κ, by Lemma S1 and E_Q(log Π_t) = (t − 1)κ.
The upper bound of Proposition S5: for every ρ > 0 and any numéraires Es of Q,
there is a constant C with Γ_T ≤ log η_T + C for T ≥ 1, where η_T is the value of the
stopping problem of Lemma 2(ii). The process (Π_{t∧T}/η_T)_{t≥0} is an e-process, and its regret
at t ≤ T is log η_T + d_t, where d_t = 0 for t ≥ t_ρ, since Π_t is then the numéraire.
The e-process property does not involve the alternative; we take it from Proposition 1(iii) for
the mixture with ρ = 1, whose numéraires are the Π_t (Proposition 2).
Proposition S5 #
Proposition S5, the limit: for every ρ > 0 and any numéraires Es of Q, given the
lower bound (S9) of Lemma S6, Γ_T/log log T → 1 − s².
Proposition 3 from Lemma S6 #
Proposition 3.