The products ∏_{i=2}^t ℓ(Y_i) form a test martingale with respect to (𝒢_t) #
This file proves the last claim of Proposition 2, following its proof: under P_θ, the Y_i are
independent N(0, 1) variables by Lemma S2(iii), and E{ℓ(Z)} = 1 for Z ∼ N(0, 1). The
products ∏_{i=2}^t ℓ(Y_i), t ≥ 0, therefore form a test martingale with respect to (𝒢_t).
nullDist_map_helmertYandintegral_lik_helmertY: underP_θ,Y_i ∼ N(0, 1)andE_θ{ℓ(Y_i)} = 1fori ≥ 2;indep_helmertY_helmertFiltration: underP_θ,Y_{t+1}is independent of𝒢_tfort ≥ 1;prop_numeraire_testMartingale: the test martingale of Proposition 2.
Under P_θ, Y_i ∼ N(0, 1) for i ≥ 2 (Lemma S2(iii)).
theorem
LogOptimal.indep_helmertY_helmertFiltration
(θ : ℝ)
{t : ℕ}
(ht : 1 ≤ t)
:
ProbabilityTheory.Indep (MeasurableSpace.comap (helmertY (t + 1)) inferInstance) (↑helmertFiltration t) (nullDist θ)
Under P_θ, Y_{t+1} is independent of 𝒢_t = σ(Y₂, …, Y_t) for t ≥ 1, since
X̄_{t+1}, Y₂, …, Y_{t+1} are independent by Lemma S2(iii).
theorem
LogOptimal.prop_numeraire_testMartingale
(s : ℝ)
:
0 < s →
IsTestMartingale gaussNull helmertFiltration fun (t : ℕ) (x : ℕ → ℝ) => ∏ i ∈ Finset.Icc 2 t, lik s (helmertY i x)
Proposition 2, last claim: under every P_θ, the products E*_t = ∏_{i=2}^t ℓ(Y_i),
t ≥ 0, form a test martingale with respect to (𝒢_t).