Documentation

LogOptimalEProcesses.Gaussian.TestMartingale

The products ∏_{i=2}^t ℓ(Y_i) form a test martingale with respect to (𝒢_t) #

This file proves the last claim of Proposition 2, following its proof: under P_θ, the Y_i are independent N(0, 1) variables by Lemma S2(iii), and E{ℓ(Z)} = 1 for Z ∼ N(0, 1). The products ∏_{i=2}^t ℓ(Y_i), t ≥ 0, therefore form a test martingale with respect to (𝒢_t).

Under P_θ, Y_i ∼ N(0, 1) for i ≥ 2 (Lemma S2(iii)).

theorem LogOptimal.integrable_lik_helmertY {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) (θ : ℝ) {i : ℕ} (hi : 2 ≤ i) :
MeasureTheory.Integrable (fun (x : ℕ → ℝ) => lik s (helmertY i x)) (nullDist θ)
theorem LogOptimal.integral_lik_helmertY {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) (θ : ℝ) {i : ℕ} (hi : 2 ≤ i) :
∫ (x : ℕ → ℝ), lik s (helmertY i x) ∂nullDist θ = 1
theorem LogOptimal.helmertFamily_of_ne_zero {t : ℕ} (j : Fin t) (hj : ↑j ≠ 0) :
helmertFamily t j = helmertY (↑j + 1)

Under P_θ, Y_{t+1} is independent of 𝒢_t = σ(Y₂, …, Y_t) for t ≥ 1, since X̄_{t+1}, Y₂, …, Y_{t+1} are independent by Lemma S2(iii).

theorem LogOptimal.prop_numeraire_testMartingale (s : ℝ) :
0 < s → IsTestMartingale gaussNull helmertFiltration fun (t : ℕ) (x : ℕ → ℝ) => ∏ i ∈ Finset.Icc 2 t, lik s (helmertY i x)

Proposition 2, last claim: under every P_θ, the products E*_t = ∏_{i=2}^t ℓ(Y_i), t ≥ 0, form a test martingale with respect to (𝒢_t).